Indian J Sex Transm Dis Indian J Sex Transm Dis
Official Publication of the Indian Association for the Study of Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Indian J Sex Transm Dis
The Journal | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscribe | Login    Users online: 476   Home Email this page Print this page Bookmark this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size


 
  Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 125-131
 

Psychological health and well-being in patients with sexually transmitted infections: A prospective cross-sectional study


Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission28-Sep-2019
Date of Decision04-Dec-2019
Date of Acceptance18-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication20-Oct-2021

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Satyendra Kumar Singh
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221 005, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijstd.IJSTD_77_19

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Background: Patients with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) suffer not only with the physical problems but also with various psychological problems. Majority of bacterial STIs are treatable in a short period, while viral STIs may persist for longer duration or have frequent recurrences. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was To study different aspects of psychological health and well-being in patients with STIs. Materials and Methods: Study design was a prospective cross-sectional hospital-based study. Data were collected during July 2016–April 2018. STIs were divided into four groups (genital herpes, genital warts, and genital discharge and syphilis). One way analysis of variance and Scheffe Test were used for analysis of the data. Results: A total of 410 patients were included in the study. Majority of patients were suffering with genital herpes (139), followed by warts (104), discharge (92), and syphilis (75). Genital herpes and genital warts indicated significantly more cognitive affective (CA) depression as compared to the patients suffering with syphilis. Satisfaction with life was more with genital discharge and syphilis in comparison to the patients with genital warts and genital herpes. Genital herpes showed more perceived stress in comparison to genital discharge. Genital warts indicated more somatic depression as compared to syphilis and genital discharge patients while genital herpes showed more somatic depression than in patients suffering with genital discharge. Genital warts and genital herpes indicated significantly more overall depression as compared to the patients suffering with syphilis. Conclusion: Overall depression was more in patients with genital herpes and warts. The findings provide empirical bases for extended studies on behavioral intervention programs.


Keywords: Affect, depression, perceived stress, satisfaction with life, sexually transmitted infections


How to cite this article:
Singh S, Singh SK. Psychological health and well-being in patients with sexually transmitted infections: A prospective cross-sectional study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2021;42:125-31

How to cite this URL:
Singh S, Singh SK. Psychological health and well-being in patients with sexually transmitted infections: A prospective cross-sectional study. Indian J Sex Transm Dis [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 30];42:125-31. Available from: https://www.ijstd.org/text.asp?2021/42/2/0/328745





   Introduction Top


Psychological distresses are commonly associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and have been reported in viral STIs. Merin and Pachankis described interaction between psychological and physical health and highlighted that negative affect (NA) and poor coping may affect genital herpes recurrences.[1] The highest frequency is observed in urban populations aged between 15 and 35 years.[2] STIs are common, diverse, and dangerous to health extending from bacterial diseases that may be readily treatable once diagnosed; to viral infections such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) that can be life threatening.

STIs have been euphemistically named as “social diseases” referring to social factors as important determinants of risk and case distribution of the diseases involving human sexual activity.[3] STIs are associated with an important psychological and social burden.[4] Individuals who have been diagnosed with STIs reported shame, anxiety, embarrassment, isolation, fear of rejection, and fear of not being sexually desirable.[5],[6],[7],[8] Shame might be caused by the violation of some role or standard, the failure to meet expectations, or by a defect of the self that cannot easily be repaired.[9] The study was designed to highlight the pattern and its differences among STIs patients on affect (positive and negative), satisfaction with life, perceived stress, and depression (CA and somatic).


   Materials and Methods Top


Study design was a cross-sectional hospital-based study. The study was performed at a tertiary health care center during July 2016–April 2018. Patients suffering with STIs were enrolled for the study. Diagnosis of STIs was done on the basis of history, clinical findings, and relevant laboratory tests. All the patients were subjected to rapid plasma regain (RPR) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for HIV-1 and 2. Inclusion criteria were patients with STIs with age between 15 and 70 years and given written consent to participate in the study (for the minor the consent of the parents was taken). Exclusion criteria were patients suffering with any other genital dermatological conditions, mentally ill, venerophobic, suffering from any systemic illness, and HIV infected.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated using the following formula:

n = z21−α/2 p (1 − p)/d2

Where, p = prevalence = 0.50

d = absolute precision = 0.05

z21− α/2 = 1.96 (level of confidence of 95% at two-tailed test).

Using the above formula, sample size was found as = 384.

Assuming the 6% nonresponse/incomplete response rate, the effective sample size was = 384 + 26 = 410.

Tools for the study

The positive and NA Scale (PANAS).[10] Positive Affect (PA) reflects the extent to which a person feels enthusiastic, active, and alert. NA is a general dimension of subjective distress and unpleasurable engagement that subsumes a wide variety of aversive mood states. Both PA and NA schedules consist of 10 items in each to be rated on a 5-point scale ranging from very slightly or not at all (1) to extremely (5). The PANAS has been observed to have high internal consistency and construct validity.[10],[11]

The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS)[12] measures global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one's life. The task of the subject is to indicate how much he/she agree or disagree with each of the five items using a 7-point scale: (7) strongly agree to (1) strongly disagree. The internal consistency of the SWLS has been found to be excellent (alpha coefficients = 0.83–0.92), whereas the test–retest reliability for the total SWLS has been reported to be adequate (r = 0.65). The SWLS has been replicated in a number of studies.[13],[14]

The perceived stress scale (PSS)[15] is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. It is a multiple-item scale and was developed to measure the degree to which overall transactions with the environment were appraised as stressful.[16],[17] PSS is a 10-item scale and it includes a number of direct queries about current levels of experienced stress. The questions asked about feelings and thoughts during the last month, along a 5-point scale ranging from never (0) to very often (4).

Beck's Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)[18] is an inventory composed of 21 categories of symptoms and attitudes. Each category describes a specific behavioral manifestation of depression and consists of a graded series of 3–4 self-evaluative statements, from which the respondent has to select statement that describes the way they have been feeling during the past week. Numerical values from 0 to 3 are assigned to each statement to indicate the degree of severity/intensity, and the total added scores indicate the level of depression, whether mild, moderate, or severe, with higher scores reflecting more severe depression.[18] Alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.89,[19] suggesting a high level of internal consistency of BDI-II. Many studies have documented its internal consistency and supported its validity. The somatic factor and CA factor had alpha coefficients of 0.72 and 0.87, respectively, suggesting that they both showed high level of internal consistency.

STIs patients were categorized into four groups (genital herpes, genital warts, genital discharge: Urethral and vaginal and syphilis). They were individually investigated for studies on affect (positive and negative), satisfaction with life, perceived stress, and depression (CA and somatic).

Statistical analysis

Respondent-wise scores on the specific items of the study variables (following the respective manuals) and results analyzed with the help of Statistical package for the social sciences 16.0 (IBM, Armonk, 19 NY:IBM Corp, Chicago, USA) Data were presented in number and percentage. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for k = 4 with unequal sample size and Scheffe Test for post hoc mean comparisons were used.


   Results Top


A total of 463 cases were initially registered for the study. Nineteen cases of genital molluscum contagiosum, 9 cases of chancroid, 2 cases of lymphogranuloma venereum, and 23 cases of mixed infections were excluded from the study. Finally, 410 patients were included in the study. Majority of patients were males (67.80%) and married (51.50%). The most common age group was 26–40 years, followed by 15–25 years. In respect to educational qualifications, most of the patients were graduate and above (63.17%). Our patients mainly belonged to rural background (69%) and were Hindus (91.20%). According to profession, student was the most common category (33.70%), followed by government and private service class (23.20%). Genital herpes was the predominant STI category (33.90%), followed by genital warts (25.37%). Patients' characteristics are given in [Table 1].{Table 1}

The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of transformed scores on the study variables for the whole sample as well as the mean ± SD values on the study variables for the four STIs groups are shown in [Table 2]. The “between groups” (four STIs groups) difference on the subscales/subfactors of the behavioral measures were highlighted by computing One-way ANOVA for k = 4 with unequal sample size [Table 3] and post hoc mean comparisons [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]. Results revealed a significant difference between groups effects on NA (F = 7.91, df = 3/409; P < 0.001) in patients suffering with genital herpes (M = 9.87) and genital warts (M = 9.73). It was significantly more NA as compared to the patients suffering with genital discharge (M = 8.94). Other comparisons revealed nonsignificant patterns of mean differences. On PA (F = 3.54, df = 3/409; P < 0.05), patients suffering from genital discharge (M = 10.78) indicated significantly more PA as compared to the patients suffering from genital warts (M = 10.19) only. On satisfaction with life (F = 27.81, df = 3/409; P < 0.001), patients suffering from genital discharge (M = 9.06) and syphilis (M = 8.91) indicated significantly more satisfaction with life as compared to the patients suffering with genital warts (M = 7.96) and genital herpes (M = 7.87). Perceived stress (F = 3.93, df = 3/409; P < 0.001) in patients suffering from genital herpes (M = 10.52) indicated significantly more stress as compared to patients with genital discharge (M = 10.04) and that all other comparisons emerged to be more or less equal. On CA depression (F = 6.50, df = 3/409; P < 0.001), patients with genital herpes (M = 10.63) and genital warts (M = 10.62) indicated significantly more CA depression as compared to the patients with syphilis (M = 9.86), and all other comparisons emerged to be more or less equal. Somatic depression (F = 6.81, df = 3/409; P < 0.001) in genital warts (M = 6.25) indicated significantly more somatic depression as compared to the patients suffering with syphilis (M = 5.77) and genital discharge (M = 5.78). Furthermore, patients suffering with genital herpes (M = 6.13) indicated significantly more somatic depression as compared to the patients suffering with genital discharge (M = 5.78). All other three comparisons revealed nonsignificant patterns of mean difference. Overall depression (F = 8.55, df = 3/409; P < 0.001) in patients with genital warts (M = 12.27) and genital herpes (M = 12.22) indicated significantly more overall depression as compared to the patients with syphilis (M = 11.41).{Table 2}{Table 3}{Table 4}{Table 5}{Table 6}


   Discussion Top


Medical treatment may not be sufficient in the management of STIs patients. A lot of social stigma are attached with STIs in our society. Premarital and extra martial contacts are still not socially accepted in our culture. Studies on psychological aspects in patients with syphilis are very limited, and it has been never compared with viral STIs in best of our knowledge. The mean ± SD values together with the range of scores for the whole sample coupled with the mean ± SD values and range of scores for the four STIs groups on study variables were computerized. Observations revealed that distribution of mean ± SD values to be disproportionate, hence challenge the assumptions of parametric statistical analysis. Following these observations, the test scores were checked for homogeneity of variance. Results revealed significant Levene's ratios, suggesting heterogeneity of variance; therefore, the test scores of the study variables were transformed and analyzed by applying parametric inferential statistical methods. Majority of researchers had compared the trends of psychological outcomes but some had compared the mean of the trends. In the present study, we have compared the trends not the mean of the trends. A consistent pattern of mean differences (as observed in the present study) merits special mention that: (i) patients either suffering from genital herpes or genital warts (showing no reliable difference between them) generally manifest more cognitive and somatic depression, overall depression, perception of stress, and NA, than in patients suffering syphilis and genital discharge (showing no reliable difference between them), and (ii) patients suffering from syphilis and genital discharge indicated more satisfaction with life and PA as compared to the patients suffering with genital herpes and genital warts. Patients suffering with nonviral infections indicated more mean indices on these measures as compare to the patients suffering with viral STIs. In our study, only four groups of STIs were categorized due to very less number of other STIs. Majority of genital herpes cases were of recurrent genital herpes. Syphilitic patients were of primary, secondary, and latent cases. Urethral discharge patients comprised both gonococcal and chlamydial infections. In females, vaginal discharge included cervicitis (gonococcal and chlamydial), candidal vulvovaginitis, and bacterial vaginosis. Due to less number of urethral and vaginal discharges, both were included jointly in genital discharge category. Majority of our patients were students, educated, and internet friendly. After getting diagnosed and labeled with STIs, they used to get information through internet. In the case of genital herpes, they were mainly worried of its lifelong persistence, transmission, and disclosure to their life partner. Patients with genital warts were mainly concern with possibility of genital cancer development latter on. Some syphilitic patients had fear of cardio syphilis and neurosyphilis due to persistence of RPR test reactivity.

On the whole, the patients either suffering from genital herpes or genital warts generally manifested more NA, perception of stress, CA, somatic depression, and overall depression. Qualitative studies revealed that acquiring genital herpes or genital warts has a profound impact on self-conceptualization,[20],[21] which requires the individual to come to terms with their diagnosis and preexisting prejudices concerning the types of individuals who obtain STIs. The process of blending this new information was easier for individuals who did not hold strong prejudices or stereotypes regarding individuals who acquire STIs before their diagnosis.[20] However, among individuals who held strong preconceptions, this process takes longer and the psychosocial impact of the diagnosis appears to be stronger.[22] Quantitative studies also reveal that individuals report the highest levels of psychosocial distress immediately following a diagnosis.[22],[23]

Individuals with external genital warts reported lower levels of quality of life than those who experience normal Pap smears or abnormal Pap smears that have not been confirmed with biopsy.[24] However, individuals with genital warts reported lower levels of quality of life than those with a biopsy confirmation on more global measures of well-being, despite having a medically less serious condition. Similarly, individuals who were diagnosed for herpes simplex virus 2 serologically without previous experience with symptoms displayed lower levels of prolonged distress than individuals with a history of herpes symptoms.[22],[25],[26]

Global measures of psychosocial well-being tend to suggest gradual coping with a genital herpes or genital warts diagnosis, disease-specific measures tend to suggest a prolonged period of increased psychosocial distress. Measures of general anxiety, depression, isolation, fear, and sadness have tended to show little to no difference from baseline among those newly diagnosed at 3-month follow-up.[25],[26] A majority of participants report that herpes or genital warts negatively impacted their life or relationships.[21],[27] The relationship between NA and physical health, conceptualizing NA as an umbrella for a range of negative mood states, such as anger, disgust, fear, scorn, and depression.[28]

Studies revealed that NA sparks two biological pathways: The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system. Both pathways are associated with heightened physiological responses such as high heart rate, high blood pressure, high levels of adrenaline, and high levels of cortisol, all of which are potentially detrimental to one's physical health. NA has direct, negative effects on immune functioning by prompting the release of various pituitary and adrenal hormones, such as catecholamines and cortisol that modulate the immune system.[29] The end result of these pathways is the onset, flare-up, progression, and increase in the severity of a physical illness, ultimately leading to greater health-care seeking, disability insurance use, and symptom reporting.[30] Direct effects may include hormonal, metabolic, or neurochemical changes and indirect effects may be treatment side effects and sleep disturbances, perhaps as a result of pain and discomfort.[30] Behaviorally, one might adopt sick-role behaviors or experience a disrupted routine; instead of going to work daily activity normally. Maladaptive coping behaviors may also be adopted, which can lead to more NA. Cognitively, a physically ill individual may also experience thought distortions, perceived stress, perceived loss of control, and loss of self-efficacy.


   conclusion Top


The findings of the study conclude that significant psychological distresses were in patients with viral STIs as compared to non-viral STIs.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge Uttar Pradesh Aids Control Society for providing tests reagents, kits used in laboratory diagnosis of STIs.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Merin A, Pachankis JE. The psychological impact of genital herpes stigma. J Health Psychol 2011;16:80-90.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organiztion. Global prevalence and incidence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections; 2010. Available from: http://www.who.int/HIV_AIDS/GRSTI/index.htm. [Last accessed on 2010 Oct 10].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Woodhouse DE, Muth JB, Pratts CI, Fogle JS 2nd. Gonorrhea as a social disease. Sex Transm Dis 1985;12:25-32.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nack A. Damaged goods: Women managing the stigma of STDs. Deviant Behav 2000;21:95-121.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Darroch J, Myers L, Cassell J. Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: A qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme. Sex Transm Infect 2003;79:372-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Duncan B, Hart G, Scoular A, Bigrigg A. Qualitative analysis of psychosocial impact of diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis: Implications for screening. BMJ 2001;322:195-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lindberg C, Lewis-Spruill C, Crownover R. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: Urban male adolescents speak out. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2006;29:73-88.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Osborn DP, King MB, Weir M. Psychiatric health in a sexually transmitted infections clinic: Effect on reattendance. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:267-72.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Lewis M. Shame the exposed self. New York, NY: Free Press; 1992.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54:1063-70.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2004;43:245-65.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 1985;49:71-5.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Dijkers MP. Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:867-76.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Geyh S, Fellinghauer BA, Kirchberger I, Post MW. Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010;8:94.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Cohen S, McKay G. Social support, stress and the buffering hypothesis: A theoretical analysis. In: Baum AJE, Singer, Taylor SE, editors. Handbook of Psychology and Health. Vol. IV. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1984. p. 521-37.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Abell N. The Index of Clinical Stress: A brief measure of subjective stress for practice and research. Soci Work Res Abstr 1991;27:12-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Monroe SM, Kelley JM. Measurement of stress appraisal. In: Cohen S, Kessler RC, Gordon LU, editors. Measuring Stress: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. p. 122-47.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. 2nd ed. Boston: Harcourt Brace; 1996.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: Twenty -five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988;8:77-100.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hammarlund K, Lundgren I, Nystrom M. To contract genital warts - A risk of losing love? Experiences of Swedish men living with genital warts. Int J Mens Health 2007;6:100-14.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Melville J, Sniffen S, Crosby R, Salazar L, Whittington W, Dithmer-Schreck D, et al. Psychosocial impact of serological diagnosis of herpes simplex virus type 2: A qualitative assessment. Sex Transm Infect 2003;79:280-5.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Mark H, Gilbert L, Nanda J. Psychosocial well-being and quality of life among women newly diagnosed with genital herpes. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009;38:320-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Handsfield HH, Warren T, Werner M, Phillips JA. Suppressive therapy with valacyclovir in early genital herpes: A pilot study of clinical efficacy and herpes-related quality of life. Sex Transm Dis 2007;34:339-43.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Pirotta M, Stein AN, Conway EL, Harrison C, Britt H, Garland S. Genital warts incidence and healthcare resource utilisation in Australia. Sex Transm Infect 2010;86:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Miyai T, Turner KR, Kent CK, Klausner J. The psychosocial impact of testing individuals with no history of genital herpes for herpes simplex virus type 2. Sex Transm Dis 2004;31:517-21.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Rosenthal SL, Zimet GD, Leichliter JS, Stanberry LR, Fife KH, Tu W, et al. The psychosocial impact of serological diagnosis of asymptomatic herpes simplex virus type 2 infection. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:154-7.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Newton DC, McCabe MP. Sexually transmitted infections: Impact on individuals and their relationships. J Health Psychol 2008;13:864-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Watson D, Pennebaker JW. Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychol Rev 1989;96:234-54.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Kiecolt-Glaser JK, McGuire L, Robles TF, Glaser R. Psychoneuroimmunology: Psychological influences on immune function and health. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70:537-47.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Cohen S, Rodriquez MS. Pathways linking affective disturbances and physical disorders. Health Psychol 1995;14:374-80.  Back to cited text no. 30
    




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
  Search
 
  
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (508 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   conclusion
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed308    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal